Industries / Software & SaaS / Pain Point
software & saas

You changed the pricing. Four assistants did not notice.

You renamed a tier and moved a feature up a plan. The pricing page changed. The docs did not, nor did four blog posts, the integrations directory listing, two review-site profiles and the llms.txt file. Buyers now get quoted a price you do not offer, sometimes by a machine, and the first you hear of it is on a sales call.

together
page, docs and schema move as one
monthly
what the models believe about you
reviewed
a person checks before it ships

A pricing change is never one page

It is the pricing page, the plan comparison, the FAQ, the docs that reference limits, the blog posts that quoted the old number, the schema markup behind all of them and the third-party listings you filled in two years ago. Changing the first one and missing the rest is the normal outcome, because nobody holds the full list.

Why the machines make it worse

Assistants answering "how much does X cost" assemble from whatever they can find, and a confident old number on a third-party page outranks a new one you published last week. Conflicting figures across your own site are worse again: a model holding three versions of your pricing has low confidence in all of them, and low confidence reads as risk, so it recommends something else.

How askotter keeps it consistent

Every place a fact appears is tracked, so a pricing change moves the page, the docs, the posts, the schema and the llms.txt file together rather than one at a time. Third-party listings that carry your details are monitored and corrections are raised where the listing allows it. Each month the report shows which prompts returned you and what the models currently believe about your pricing.

what askotter catches

Real-time detection in action.

Two assistants still quote the retired $29 tier when asked what you cost. Source is a review-site profile last updated in 2024. Correction request drafted. 40 min ago
natural language query
"What do AI assistants say we cost?"
Three of five return the current pricing. Two quote the retired $29 tier, both citing the same review-site profile. Your own docs still reference the old limits on four pages, which is the likely second source. Corrections drafted for the pages you control and a correction request prepared for the profile you do not.
Sources: Prompt audit + your site
get started

Ready to fix this?

The free audit shows what on your site is out of date or costing you work.

Get a free audit ← Back to Software & SaaS